{"id":45,"date":"2021-08-10T20:54:14","date_gmt":"2021-08-10T20:54:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/digitalexhibits.syr.edu\/syracuse8\/?page_id=45"},"modified":"2024-08-09T15:50:58","modified_gmt":"2024-08-09T15:50:58","slug":"trustee-faculty-and-student-committee-report","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/digitalexhibits.syr.edu\/syracuse8\/trustee-faculty-and-student-committee-report\/","title":{"rendered":"Trustee, Faculty, and Student Committee Report"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n

Trustee, Faculty, and Student Committee Report\n<\/span><\/h1>\n

On September 23, 1970, Chancellor Corbally announced the appointment of a twelve-member University committee to investigate the allegations of racism in the football program. Comprising members of the Board of Trustees, faculty, and students, they spent ten weeks hearing testimony from over forty people. <\/p>\n\n

The committee issued its lengthy report on December 10, 1970, concluding that \u201cracism in the Syracuse University Athletic Department is real, chronic, largely unintentional, and sustained and complicated unwittingly by many modes of behavior common in American athletics and long-standing at Syracuse University\u2026.The definition of the spring boycott of the Black athletes merely as an issue of violating coaching authority, and the penalizing of these athletes without taking into consideration the broader context of their protest was an act of institutional racism unworthy of a great university.\u201d Chancellor Corbally called the report a \u201cfair conclusion.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

Finding the Athletic Department \u201cshowed an unwarranted insensitivity\u201d and was dismissive of concerns raised by Black players on the team, the committee recommended changes to Syracuse University athletics. Some of these recommendations included establishing a new Athletic Policy Board and directing it to develop a new Code for Student Athletes where they \u201cenjoy the same basic personal rights as all other students at Syracuse University, and thus such things as personal appearance, social activities and political expression are matters of individual choice\u2026.\u201d The committee also endorsed making changes to the Athletic Department, including appointment of Black staff, and setting up a new grievance procedure for student-athletes to encourage dialogue and reduce the fear of penalization.<\/p>\n\n

The committee only had the power to make recommendations. In January 1971 Chancellor Corbally reported to the Board of Trustees\u2019 Executive Committee about one of the recommendations, the proposed establishment of a new Athletic Policy Board. The Trustees in turn voted five to four to form a committee to review the recommendation. \n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n